Tom Lane wrote:
ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes, I only used the 'disjoint representations for first-bytes and
not-first-bytes of MB characters' feature in UTF8. Other encodings
allows both [AB] and [BA] for MB character patterns. UTF8Match() does
not cope with those encodings; If we have '[AB][AB]' in a table and
search it with LIKE '%[BA]%', we judge that they are matched by mistake.
AFAICS, the patch does *not* make that mistake because % will not
advance over a fractional character.
Unless I hear differently, my present intention is to apply the
suggested improvement universally. I'll wait a day or two before
completing the patch.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
