Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I understand it, the problem is that while currently LIMIT without
> ORDER BY always starts at the beginning of the table, it will not with
> this patch. I consider that acceptable.
It's definitely going to require stronger warnings than we have now
about using LIMIT without ORDER BY.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
