On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 11:05 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > BTW: Should we do the synchronization in the non-page-at-a-time mode? > It's not many lines of code to do so, but IIRC that codepath is only > used for catalog access. System tables really shouldn't grow that big, > and if they do we shouldn't be doing seq scans for them anyway. Does the > unstable ordering confuse any catalog accesses?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg01199.php There is a very minor assumption there that scans on pg_class will return in the same order. I'm not sure if that's even a problem. Regards, Jeff Davis ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
