Gregory Stark wrote:
It's pretty serious what you're suggesting since it means that we'll basically never have a real cluster feature. I would sure hope we're missing something and there's a way to make this work usefully.
Another approach would be an online CLUSTER command. That means there'll be a lot of churn when tuples need to be moved back and forth, along with updating indexes, but it'd take the overhead out of the critical path.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
