"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stefan mentioned that the warning may be one that shows up in a different > compiler somewhere as well, thouh, which might indicate that we should fix > the underlying issue? (Even if the code is correct, if it confuses multiple > compilers...)
I think the right fix is just to remove the const qualifier. It's clearly not treating the pointer as const if it's passing it to pfree which is surely a state change if anything is. We do far too much casting to (void*) as it is and I would dearly love to go through the whole source tree and remove all the redundant casts. All they do is cover up real type clash bugs. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
