On 9/13/07, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, I just checked the work-in-progress patch I sent you back in July. > I refactored it to use one-based offsets for consistency, since I > modified log_heap_clean quite heavily anyway. > > It's possible that I broke it in the process, I was only interested in > testing the performance characteristics of the simplified pruning scheme. > > I don't think so -- atleast I couldn't figure out why its broken. But I would take Tom's comment seriously and look more into it tomorrow. Or we can just revert it back to zero-based offsets.
Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
