Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So don't initialize a local variable unless
>>> you're giving it an actually meaningful value.
>
>> The downside is that we see a useless warning that, if sufficiently
>> multiplied, might make it hard to see something we are interested in.
>
> [ looks again... ] Actually, I think you just proved my point for me.
> The ZeroMemory call should go away, no? (Does this mean that the
> Windows builds fail to detect dereferencing NULL? Bad if so.)
Windows builds don't fail to detect that in genereal. ZeroMemory,
however, has a protection specifically against being passed NULL input,
IIRC.
//Magnus
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
