> I think a prefix of ':' would be good, as it's already a > standard, kinda. Anybody who names a database object :foo > deserves whatever happens to them :P >
I for one like something less cryptic than ':' besids going with ':' means extra hack in gram.y (Ones we get to implement packages I prefer to have "this.arg" and "global.arg" than ':' and '::' but I guess that's another discussion.) Regards, Gevik. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
