Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>> Is it possible to make it a WARNING instead of an ERROR? Right now I get:
>>
> No. All of the other types emit an ERROR if you're trying an out of
> range value.
I don't think that follows. A tsearch index is lossy anyway, so there's
no hard and fast reason why it should reject entries that it can't index
completely. I think it would be more useful to index whatever it can
(probably just the words in the first N bytes of the document) than to
prevent you from storing the document.
There is another precedent too, namely that tsearch already discards
individual words over so-many-bytes long. If it doesn't throw an error
for that case, why is it throwing an error for this one?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
