Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I run it every few years rather than every year because it can break > > stuff that we have to manually fix by adding includes. > > > If you want it run now or every year, let me know. > > I'm not in a hurry --- as we found out last time, that script isn't > really bright enough. When the state of the headers gets bad enough > that we're willing to accept collateral damage, then it should be > run, but I don't think it's reliable enough to use routinely.
Agreed, that was my analysis too. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
