Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know I should still be looking at code from the March Commitfest but I was > annoyed by this *very* FAQ:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-04/msg00402.php Seems like pg_relation_size and/or pgstattuple would solve his problem better, especially since he'd not have to abort and restart the long query to find out if it's making progress. It'd help if pgstattuple were smarter about "dead" vs uncommitted tuples, though. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
