Hi Brendan,
I thought you were referring to the spaces sourrounding the word "FOREIGN KEY"
on the last line and hence my explaination was out of place.I am glad that you
have corrected the indentation to 4 spaces. Those were unintentional at 2
spaces from myside.
However,Why does the word "FOREIGN KEY" appear in the last line of your output.
My original patch had the output like this.
Referenced by: "bar_foo_fkey" IN public.bar(foo) REFERENCES foo(a)
The keyword "FOREIGN KEY" was removed by me as it would further cause a
confusion.
Secondly, since the table foo is altered with an addition of a new column
"bar", it doesn't display in your output. Please double check.
My output is looking like this:
testdb=# \d foo Table "public.foo" Column | Type |
Modifiers--------+---------+----------- a | integer | not null bar |
integer | not null /* Brendan--this line is missing in your
output */Indexes: "foo_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (a)Foreign-key constraints:
"foo_bar_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (bar) REFERENCES bar(a)Referenced by:
"bar_foo_fkey" IN public.bar(foo) REFERENCES foo(a)
/* please ignore the 2 space indent, I am still using my orignal patch. I will
correct it later */
Thanks,Kenneth> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:04:35 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
pgsql-patches@postgresql.org> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reference by output in :
\d <table_name>> > Brendan Jurd escribió:> > > Yeah, that's what I figured. The
patch I attached to my previous> > email should fix it up.> > Applied, thanks.>
> -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/> PostgreSQL Replication,
Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
_________________________________________________________________
Fashion Channel : Want to know what’s the latest in the fashion world ? You
have it all here on MSN Fashion.
http://lifestyle.in.msn.com/
