Tom Lane escribió: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I came up with the attached patch. > > I wasn't envisioning anything anywhere near this invasive. We only > need locations on constants in a few contexts, I think.
Aha. OK, I'll commit the original patch and let you deal with the rest of it :-) > BTW, you broke _equalAConst() ... it was a bad idea anyway to recast > it on the assumption that there would never again be more than one > field. Oops, sorry, I had intended to revert that part and forgot. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
