On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 12:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I see this as being basically another cost parameter, and as such > I don't think it needs more documentation than any of those have. > (Now admittedly you could argue that they could all use a ton more > documentation than they now have, but it's not reasonable to insist > on just this one meeting a different standard.)
OK, if that's the view then the patch is ready for commit, AFAICS. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
