On Thu, 15 May 2008 11:46:41 -0400 (EDT) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce with respect the only useful thing I have seen you do to the > > patch in all this wrangling is realign the \? General options and > > frankly even that is suspect in my opinion. Can we either throw it > > away and say, "Nice try JD" or just commit the thing. > > Your patch is getting the same review any other patch would have. If > you want someone else to apply it I will stop working on it. I am not asking you to not review the patch. I am asking you to be productive in doing so. Your review of this patch is basically, "Even though there were two very long threads with several (on the greater side of several) different people contributing feedback, I think I know better". That behavior is frustrating, especially when I took an extreme amount of effort to address all concerns ahead of the actual commit fest. I wanted to make sure the patch would be easy to review and easy to commit. If I thought I was going to have to have the argument all over again, I just would have left the first submission as it was and then we could have burned all the time during commit fest only. Now Alvaro, Tom and I are all having the same discussion all over again but this time with Bruce. It makes no sense. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature