pavan95 wrote
> Hi all,
> 
> Hope my mail finds you in good time. I had a problem with a query which is
> hitting the production seriously.
> The below is the sub part of the query for which I cannot reduce the CPU
> cost. 
> 
> Please check and verify whether I'm doing wrong or whether that type index
> type suits it or not. 
> 
> Kindly help me resolve this issue.
> 
> *Query*:
> 
> explain select sum(CASE
>                              WHEN MOD(cast(effort_hours as decimal),1) =
> 0.45 THEN
>                              cast(effort_hours as int)+0.75
>                              ELSE
>                                  CASE
>                                  WHEN MOD(cast(effort_hours as decimal),1)
> =
> 0.15 THEN
>                                  cast(effort_hours as int) + 0.25
>                                 
>                               ELSE
>                                  CASE
>                                  WHEN MOD(cast(effort_hours as decimal),1)
> =
> 0.30 THEN
>                                  cast(effort_hours as int) + 0.5
>                                 
>                               ELSE
>                                  CASE
>                                  WHEN MOD(cast(effort_hours as decimal),1)
> =
> 0 THEN
>                                  cast(effort_hours as int) 
>                                  end
>                                  END
>                                  END
>                              END) from tms_timesheet_details,
> tms_wsr_header
> header  where wsr_header_id=header.id and work_order_no != 'CORPORATE';
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from:
> http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html

To start with you can try re-writing this so that it only does the mod cast
once. e.g:
sum ( 
CASE MOD(cast(effort_hours as decimal),1)
        WHEN 0.45 THEN cast(effort_hours as int)+0.75
        WHEN 0.15 THEN cast(effort_hours as int)+0.25
        WHEN 0.30 THEN cast(effort_hours as int)+0.5
        WHEN 0 THEN cast(effort_hours as int)
END
)




--
Sent from: 
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html

Reply via email to