-----Original Message----- From: pgsql-performance-owner+m22888-112...@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-performance-owner+m22888-112...@lists.postgresql.org> On Behalf Of Abadie Lana Sent: 04 January 2019 09:18 To: Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> Cc: David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com>; pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org Subject: [Possible Spoof] RE: select query does not pick up the right index
Warning: This message was sent by pgsql-performance-owner+m22888-112...@lists.postgresql.org supposedly on behalf of Abadie Lana <lana.aba...@iter.org>. Please contact -----Original Message----- From: Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> Sent: 04 January 2019 00:48 To: Abadie Lana <lana.aba...@iter.org> Cc: David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com>; pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: select query does not pick up the right index On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:57:27PM +0000, Abadie Lana wrote: > Main parameters : effective_cache_size : 4GB, shared_buffers 4GB, > work_mem 4MB I doubt it will help much, but you should consider increasing work_mem, unless you have many expensive queries running at once. Could you also send the rest of the pg_statistic for that table ? https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions#Statistics:_n_distinct.2C_MCV.2C_histogram SELECT (SELECT sum(x) FROM unnest(most_common_freqs) x) frac_MCV, tablename, attname, null_frac, n_distinct, array_length(most_common_vals,1) n_mcv, array_length(histogram_bounds,1) n_hist FROM pg_stats WHERE attname='...' AND tablename='...' ORDER BY 1 DESC; Hmm. Is it normal that the couple (tablename,attname ) is not unique? I'm surprised to see sample_{ctrl,util,buil} quoted twice css_archive_3_0_0=# SELECT (SELECT sum(x) FROM unnest(most_common_freqs) x) frac_MCV, tablename, attname, null_frac, n_distinct, array_length(most_common_vals,1) n_mcv, array_length(histogram_bounds,1) n_hist FROM pg_stats WHERE attname='channel_id' AND tablename like 'sample%' ORDER BY 1 DESC; frac_mcv | tablename | attname | null_frac | n_distinct | n_mcv | n_hist ----------+-------------------+------------+-----------+------------+-------+-------- 1 | sample_buil_year | channel_id | 0 | 16 | 16 | 0.98249 | sample_ctrl | channel_id | 0 | 26 | 17 | 9 0.982333 | sample_ctrl_month | channel_id | 0 | 34 | 17 | 17 0.981533 | sample_ctrl | channel_id | 0 | 28 | 18 | 10 0.9371 | sample_ctrl_year | channel_id | 0 | 38 | 16 | 22 0.928767 | sample_buil_month | channel_id | 0 | 940 | 54 | 101 0.92535 | sample | channel_id | 0 | 2144 | 167 | 1001 0.907501 | sample_buil | channel_id | 0 | 565 | 43 | 101 0.8876 | sample_util_year | channel_id | 0 | 501 | 45 | 101 0.815 | sample_util | channel_id | 0 | 557 | 82 | 101 0.807667 | sample_buil | channel_id | 0 | 164 | 31 | 101 0.806267 | sample_util | channel_id | 0 | 732 | 100 | 101 0.803766 | sample_util_month | channel_id | 0 | 731 | 100 | 101 (13 rows) Ah...sample_ctrl_year and sample_buil_year have n_distinct -1? Unlike sample_util_year. Could that explain the wrong choice? SELECT (SELECT sum(x) FROM unnest(most_common_freqs) x) frac_MCV, tablename, attname, null_frac, n_distinct, array_length(most_common_vals,1) n_mcv, array_length(histogram_bounds,1) n_hist FROM pg_stats WHERE attname='smpl_time' AND tablename like 'sample%' ORDER BY 1 DESC; frac_mcv | tablename | attname | null_frac | n_distinct | n_mcv | n_hist ------------+-------------------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-------+-------- | sample_ctrl_month | smpl_time | 0 | -1 | | 101 | sample_ctrl_year | smpl_time | 0 | -1 | | 101 | sample_ctrl | smpl_time | 0 | -1 | | 101 | sample_ctrl | smpl_time | 0 | -1 | | 101 | sample_buil_year | smpl_time | 0 | -1 | | 101 0.0154667 | sample_buil_month | smpl_time | 0 | 1.03857e+06 | 100 | 101 0.0154523 | sample_buil | smpl_time | 0 | 854250 | 100 | 101 0.0115 | sample_util | smpl_time | 0 | 405269 | 100 | 101 0.0112333 | sample_util | smpl_time | 0 | 537030 | 100 | 101 0.0106667 | sample_util_month | smpl_time | 0 | 539001 | 100 | 101 0.00946667 | sample_buil | smpl_time | 0 | -0.328554 | 100 | 101 0.00852342 | sample | smpl_time | 0 | 1.5125e+07 | 1000 | 1001 0.00780001 | sample_util_year | smpl_time | 0 | 1.73199e+06 | 100 | 101 (13 rows) Based on your feedback...i rerun analyse directly on the two table sample_ctrl_year and sample_buil_year The new values are SELECT (SELECT sum(x) FROM unnest(most_common_freqs) x) frac_MCV, tablename, attname, null_frac, n_distinct, array_length(most_common_vals,1) n_mcv, array_length(histogram_bounds,1) n_hist FROM pg_stats WHERE attname='channel_id' AND tablename like 'sample%' ORDER BY 1 DESC; frac_mcv | tablename | attname | null_frac | n_distinct | n_mcv | n_hist ----------+-------------------+------------+-----------+------------+-------+-------- 0.99987 | sample_buil_year | channel_id | 0 | 76 | 16 | 60 0.999632 | sample_ctrl_year | channel_id | 0 | 132 | 31 | 101 0.999628 | sample_ctrl_month | channel_id | 0 | 84 | 23 | 61 0.999627 | sample_ctrl | channel_id | 0 | 132 | 31 | 101 0.999599 | sample_ctrl | channel_id | 0 | 42 | 22 | 20 0.998074 | sample_buil | channel_id | 0 | 493 | 122 | 371 0.997693 | sample_util | channel_id | 0 | 1379 | 509 | 870 0.991841 | sample_buil | channel_id | 0 | 9867 | 107 | 9740 0.991567 | sample_util_month | channel_id | 0 | 5716 | 504 | 5209 0.990369 | sample_util_year | channel_id | 0 | 4946 | 255 | 4689 0.990062 | sample_util | channel_id | 0 | 5804 | 641 | 5160 0.972386 | sample_buil_month | channel_id | 0 | 19946 | 148 | 10001 0.967391 | sample | channel_id | 0 | 7597 | 409 | 7178 (13 rows) Now when running the query again, only for sample_buil_year table the wrong index is picked up... explain (analyze, buffers) select 'BUIL-B36-VA-RT-RT1:CL0001-2-ABW',c.smpl_time,c.nanosecs,c.float_val,c.num_val,c.str_val,c.datatype,c.array_val from sample c WHERE c.channel_id = (SELECT channel_id FROM channel WHERE name='BUIL-B36-VA-RT-RT1:CL0001-2-ABW') order by c.smpl_time desc limit 5; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Limit (cost=13.40..30.01 rows=5 width=112) (actual time=13554.536..13554.570 rows=3 loops=1) Buffers: shared hit=26626389 read=17 InitPlan 1 (returns $0) -> Index Scan using unique_chname on channel (cost=0.41..8.43 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=26.858..26.860 rows=1 loop s=1) Index Cond: ((name)::text = 'BUIL-B36-VA-RT-RT1:CL0001-2-ABW'::text) Buffers: shared hit=2 read=2 -> Result (cost=4.96..5131208.65 rows=1544048 width=112) (actual time=13554.534..13554.567 rows=3 loops=1) Buffers: shared hit=26626389 read=17 -> Merge Append (cost=4.96..5115768.17 rows=1544048 width=80) (actual time=13554.531..13554.562 rows=3 loops=1) Sort Key: c.smpl_time DESC Buffers: shared hit=26626389 read=17 -> Index Scan Backward using smpl_time_qa_idx on sample c (cost=0.12..8.14 rows=1 width=326) (actual time=0 .005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1) Filter: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=1 -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_b_idx on sample_buil c_1 (cost=0.42..7775.26 rows=2096 width=320) (actual time=38.931..38.932 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=3 read=4 -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_c_idx on sample_ctrl c_2 (cost=0.42..77785.57 rows=22441 width=320 ) (actual time=0.010..0.010 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=3 -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_u_idx on sample_util c_3 (cost=0.43..14922.72 rows=3830 width=320) (actual time=8.939..8.939 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=1 read=2 -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_bm_idx on sample_buil_month c_4 (cost=0.56..2967.10 rows=740 width =74) (actual time=260.282..260.311 rows=3 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=3 read=5 -> Index Scan Backward using smpl_time_bx2_idx on sample_buil_year c_5 (cost=0.56..2023054.76 rows=665761 w idth=75) (actual time=13216.589..13216.589 rows=0 loops=1) Filter: (channel_id = $0) Rows Removed by Filter: 50597834 Buffers: shared hit=26626368 -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_cm_idx on sample_ctrl_month c_6 (cost=0.56..759241.36 rows=217585 width=75) (actual time=0.019..0.019 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=4 -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_cy_idx on sample_ctrl_year c_7 (cost=0.57..2097812.02 rows=602872 width=76) (actual time=0.007..0.007 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=4 -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_um_idx on sample_util_month c_8 (cost=0.57..48401.65 rows=12418 wi dth=75) (actual time=18.999..19.000 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=1 read=3 -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_uy_idx on sample_util_year c_9 (cost=0.57..54293.22 rows=16304 wid th=74) (actual time=10.739..10.739 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Buffers: shared hit=1 read=3 Planning time: 0.741 ms Execution time: 13554.666 ms (44 rows) Looking more closely to the sample_buil_year table select count(distinct channel_id),count(*) from sample_buil_year; count | count -------+---------- 100 | 50597834 (1 row) Now, the channel name I gave has no entries in sample_buil_year...(and when I run the query directly against sample_buil_year the right index is picked up).... So maybe something related with the partitioning? select 'BUIL-B36-VA-RT-RT1:CL0001-2-ABW',c.smpl_time,c.nanosecs,c.float_val,c.num_val,c.str_val,c.datatype,c.array_val from sample_buil_year c WHERE c.channel_id = (SELECT channel_id FROM channel WHERE name='BUIL-B36-VA-RT-RT1:CL0001-2-ABW') order by c.smpl_time desc limit 5; ?column? | smpl_time | nanosecs | float_val | num_val | str_val | datatype | array_val ----------+-----------+----------+-----------+---------+---------+----------+----------- (0 rows) css_archive_3_0_0=# explain analyze select 'BUIL-B36-VA-RT-RT1:CL0001-2-ABW',c.smpl_time,c.nanosecs,c.float_val,c.num_val,c.str_val,c.datatype,c.array_val from sample_buil_year c WHERE c.channel_id = (SELECT channel_id FROM channel WHERE name='BUIL-B36-VA-RT-RT1:CL0001-2-ABW') order by c.smpl_time desc limit 5; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- Limit (cost=9.00..21.31 rows=5 width=107) (actual time=0.055..0.055 rows=0 loops=1) InitPlan 1 (returns $0) -> Index Scan using unique_chname on channel (cost=0.41..8.43 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.038..0.040 rows=1 loops= 1) Index Cond: ((name)::text = 'BUIL-B36-VA-RT-RT1:CL0001-2-ABW'::text) -> Index Scan Backward using sample_time_by_idx on sample_buil_year c (cost=0.56..1639944.37 rows=665761 width=107) (ac tual time=0.054..0.054 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (channel_id = $0) Planning time: 0.178 ms Execution time: 0.088 ms (8 rows)
