Martin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My question is, should the purging of rows be done more often then once
> a day for both tables. Is this why performance seems to take a hit
> specifically?
Given that the hourly purge seems to work well for you, I'd suggest
trying it on both tables.
Non-FULL vacuum is intended to be run *frequently*, say as often as
you've updated or deleted 10% to 50% of the rows in a table. Delaying
it until you've had multiple complete turnovers of the table contents
will cost you.
> As there were too many rows purged for vacuum to
> accurately keep track of?
Only possible if you don't have the FSM parameters set high enough.
Infrequent vacuuming means you need more FSM space, btw.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
