Thanks for info. I stoped the update and removed the process that's doing the update and did vacuum analyze. This time the result says the index row has been removed :
vacuum verbose analyze dsperf_rda_or_key;
INFO: vacuuming "scncraft.dsperf_rda_or_key"
INFO: index "dsperf242_1105" now contains 300000 row versions in 12387 pages
DETAIL: 3097702 index row versions were removed.
0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
CPU 2.86s/25.49u sec elapsed 54.16 sec.
INFO: "dsperf_rda_or_key": removed 3097702 row versions in 53726 pages
DETAIL: CPU 6.29s/26.05u sec elapsed 78.23 sec.
INFO: "dsperf_rda_or_key": found 3097702 removable, 300000 nonremovable row versions in 58586 pages
DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
There were 5 unused item pointers.
0 pages are entirely empty.
CPU 10.23s/53.79u sec elapsed 135.78 sec.
INFO: analyzing "scncraft.dsperf_rda_or_key"
INFO: "dsperf_rda_or_key": 58586 pages, 3000 rows sampled, 176830 estimated total rows
VACUUM
However, when I check the disk space usage, it has not changed. Before and after the vacuum, it stayed the same :
/pg 822192 21% Sun Oct 19 09:34:25 CDT 2003 table /pg/data/base/17139/34048 Size=479936512 (relfilenode for table) index /pg/data/base/17139/336727 Size=101474304 (relfilenode for index)
Any idea here ?
Another question, if we have a process that has different threads trying to update PostgreSQL, is this going to post a problem if we do not have the thread-safety option during configure ?
Thanks.
Gan
At 1:48 am -0400 2003/10/19, Tom Lane wrote:
Seum-Lim Gan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:INFO: vacuuming "craft.dsperf_rda_or_key" INFO: index "hello242_1105" now contains 1792276 row versions in 6237 pages DETAIL: 0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable. CPU 0.61s/0.36u sec elapsed 17.92 sec. INFO: "hello_rda_or_key": found 0 removable, 1791736 nonremovable row versions in 30892 pages DETAIL: 1492218 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
You still haven't got an index-bloat problem. I am, however, starting to wonder why you have so many dead-but-unremovable rows. I think you must have some client process that's been holding an open transaction for a long time.
regards, tom lane
-- +--------------------------------------------------------+ | Seum-Lim GAN email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Lucent Technologies | | 2000 N. Naperville Road, 6B-403F tel : (630)-713-6665 | | Naperville, IL 60566, USA. fax : (630)-713-7272 | | web : http://inuweb.ih.lucent.com/~slgan | +--------------------------------------------------------+
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
