David Teran wrote: > Index?Scan?using?key_value_meta_data__id_value__fk_index,?key_value_meta > _data__id_value__fk_index?on?"KEY_VALUE_META_DATA"?t0??(cost=0.00..19.94 > ?rows=14?width=75)?(actual?time=0.112..0.296?rows=25?loops=1) > ??Index?Cond:?(("ID_VALUE"?=?21094)?OR?("ID_VALUE"?=?21103)) > Total runtime: 0.429 ms > > Much better. So i think i will first read more about this optimization > stuff and regular maintenance things. This is something i like very > much from FrontBase: no need for such things, simply start and run. But > other things were not so fine ;-). > > Is there any hint where to start to understand more about this > optimization problem?
Read the FAQ. There is an item about slow queries and indexes. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org