On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Andrew Rawnsley wrote: > 20-25% of the time. Fiddling with CPU_TUPLE_COST doesn't do anything > until I exceed 0.5, which strikes me as a bit high (though please > correct me if I am assuming too much...). RANDOM_PAGE_COST seems to have > no effect.
What about the effective cache size, is that set properly? -- /Dennis Björklund ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
