Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > scott.marlowe wrote:
> >>> There is no real need (or benefit) from having the database on a
> >>> journalled filesystem - the journalling is only trying to give similar
> >>> sorts of guarantees to what the fsync in PostgreSQL is doing.
> >> 
> >> Is this true?  I was under the impression that without at least meta-data 
> >> journaling postgresql could still be corrupted by power failure.
> 
> > It is false.  ext2 isn't crash-safe, and PostgreSQL needs an intact file
> > system for WAL recovery.
> 
> But it should be okay to set the filesystem to journal only its own
> metadata.  There's no need for it to journal file contents.

Can you set ext2 to journal metadata?  I didn't know it could do that.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to