On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Gary Doades wrote: > I should have also pointed out that MSSQL reported that same index scan > as taking 65% of the overall query time. It was just "faster". The > overall query took 103ms in MSSQL.
Are your results based on a single client accessing the database and no concurrent updates? Would adding more clients, and maybe having some client that updates/inserts into the tables, still make mssql faster then pg? Maybe it's so simple as pg being optimized for more concurrent users then mssql? I'm just asking, I don't know much about the inner workings of mssql. -- /Dennis Björklund ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
