Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Hi all,
I'm tring to optimize the following query:

http://rafb.net/paste/results/YdO9vM69.html

as you can see from the explain after defining the
index the performance is worst.

If I raise the default_statistic_target to 200
then the performance are worst then before:


Without index: 1.140 ms With index: 1.400 ms With default_statistic_targer = 200: 1.800 ms

Can I just check that 1.800ms means 1.8 secs (You're using . as the thousands separator)?


If it means 1.8ms then frankly the times are too short to mean anything without running them 100 times and averaging.

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to