Stephen Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:11:07 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Stephen Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Does postgres cache the entire result set before it begins returning
>>> data to the client?
>>
>> The backend doesn't, but libpq does, and I think JDBC does too.
> That is incredible. Why would libpq do such a thing?
Because the API it presents doesn't allow for the possibility of query
failure after having given you back a PGresult: either you have the
whole result available with no further worries, or you don't.
If you think it's "incredible", let's see you design an equally
easy-to-use API that doesn't make this assumption.
(Now having said that, I would have no objection to someone extending
libpq to offer an alternative streaming API for query results. It
hasn't got to the top of anyone's to-do list though ... and I'm
unconvinced that psql could use it if it did exist.)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
