Thanks for your repply, but I still don"t understand why the
statistic logs :! 0/0 [0/0] filesystem blocks in/out it told me there is no hard disk access, I'm sure there is, I heard my HDD, and see activity using gkrellm (even using my first query ; big select *) ? 2004-10-08 10:40:05 DEBUG: query: select * from "LINE_Line"; 2004-10-08 10:40:53 DEBUG: QUERY STATISTICS ! system usage stats: ! 48.480196 elapsed 42.010000 user 0.700000 system sec ! [42.030000 user 0.720000 sys total] ! 0/0 [0/0] filesystem blocks in/out ! 6/23 [294/145] page faults/reclaims, 0 [0] swaps ! 0 [0] signals rcvd, 0/0 [0/0] messages rcvd/sent ! 0/0 [0/0] voluntary/involuntary context switches ! postgres usage stats: ! Shared blocks: 3902 read, 0 written, buffer hit rate = 11.78% ! Local blocks: 0 read, 0 written, buffer hit rate = 0.00% ! Direct blocks: 0 read, 0 written looking at the web some logs, I saw those fields filled (i/o filesystem) Does my postgresql.conf missing an option or is therer a known bug of my postgresql server 7.2.4 ? thx regards Alban Médici on 06/10/2004 16:16 Tom Lane said the following: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Alban_M=E9dici_=28NetCentrex=29=22?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:I'm looking for the statistic of memory, CPU, filesystem access while=20 executing some regular SQL query, and I want to compare them to same kind of results while executing a cursor function.I think your second query is finding all the disk pages it needs in kernel disk cache, because they were all read in by the first query. This has little to do with cursor versus non cursor, and everything to do with hitting recently-read data again. regards, tom lane -- Alban Médici R&D software engineer ------------------------------ you can contact me @ : http://www.netcentrex.net ------------------------------ |
- Re: [pgsql-benchmarks] [PERFORM] sta... "Alban Médici (NetCentrex)"
- Re: [pgsql-benchmarks] [PERFORM... Tom Lane
- Re: [pgsql-benchmarks] [PER... "Alban Médici (NetCentrex)"