Hi guys,

I have 2 big databases on the same system. They are logically not connected, separate.

I want to keep them separate. Do you think it is better to use the same PostgreSQL server using a different location (on different disks) for each one of them, or a separate PostgreSQL server for each of them, listening to different ports and with data dirs residing on two different disks?

I have a dual Pentium 4 1Ghz with 1.5 GB RAM and 6 36GB SCSI disks (160 Ultra) on a 3 RAID 1 pairs configuration.

Thank you (sorry I am in a hurry and did not have time to look properly in the mailing list archive - please forgive me).

Ciao,
-Gabriele
--
Gabriele Bartolini: Web Programmer, ht://Dig & IWA/HWG Member, ht://Check maintainer
Current Location: Prato, Toscana, Italia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~gbartolini | ICQ#129221447
> "Leave every hope, ye who enter!", Dante Alighieri, Divine Comedy, The Inferno



-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.3 - Release Date: 26/11/2004



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to