On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 16:46:34 +0100,
Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Matthew,
>
> Matthew T. O'Connor schrieb:
>
> > The version of pg_autovacuum that I submitted for 8.0 could be
> > instructed "per table" but it didn't make the cut. Aside from moved out
> > of contrib and integrated into the backend, per table autovacuum
> > settings is probably the next highest priority.
>
> What was the reason for non-acceptance?
It wasn't reviewed until very close to freeze due to people who could do
the review being busy and then there wasn't enough time to iron some things
out before the freeze.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
