=?windows-1250?Q?Miroslav_=8Aulc?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are only JOINs number against number.
Hmph. There's no reason I can see that hash joins should be as slow as
they seem to be in your test.
Is the data confidential? If you'd be willing to send me a pg_dump
off-list, I'd like to replicate this test and try to see where the time
is going.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
