Quoting Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, Josh,
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Yes, actually. We need 3 different estimation methods:
> > 1 for tables where we can sample a large % of pages (say, >= 0.1)
> > 1 for tables where we sample a small % of pages but are "easily
> estimated"
> > 1 for tables which are not easily estimated by we can't afford to
> sample a
> > large % of pages.
> >
> > If we're doing sampling-based estimation, I really don't want
> people to lose
> > sight of the fact that page-based random sampling is much less
> expensive than
> > row-based random sampling. We should really be focusing on
> methods which
> > are page-based.
Okay, although given the track record of page-based sampling for
n-distinct, it's a bit like looking for your keys under the streetlight,
rather than in the alley where you dropped them :-)
How about applying the distinct-sampling filter on a small extra data
stream to the stats collector?
--
Engineers think equations approximate reality.
Physicists think reality approximates the equations.
Mathematicians never make the connection.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
