Nicolas,
These sizes would not be considered large. I would leave them
as single tables.
Ken
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:08:54PM +0200, Nicolas Beaume wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a large database with 4 large tables (each containing at least
> 200 000 rows, perhaps even 1 or 2 million) and i ask myself if it's
> better to split them into small tables (e.g tables of 2000 rows) to
> speed the access and the update of those tables (considering that i will
> have few update but a lot of reading).
>
> Do you think it would be efficient ?
>
> Nicolas, wondering if he hadn't be too greedy
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ? soyez ce que vous voudriez avoir l'air d'?tre ? Lewis Caroll
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
