On 8/24/05, Alexandre Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i wouldn't be so stunned if the newer machine was ( say ) twice faster > than the older server, but over three times faster is disturbing.
RAID5 on so few spindles is a known losing case for PostgreSQL. You'd
be far, far better off doing a pair of RAID1 sets or a single RAID10
set.
/rls
--
:wq
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
