Micahel, On 12/2/05 1:46 PM, "Michael Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not necessarily; you may be betting that it's more *efficient* to do the > parsing on a bunch of lightly loaded clients than your server. Even if > you're using the same code this may be a big win. If it were possible in light of the issues on client parse / convert, then we should analyze whether it's a performance win. In the restore case, where we've got a dedicated server with a dedicated client machine, I don't see why there would be a speed benefit from running the same parse / convert code on the client versus running it on the server. Imagine a pipeline where there is a bottleneck, moving the bottleneck to a different machine doesn't make it less of a bottleneck. - Luke ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
