On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:06:30 -0700,
Tony Wasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ah thanks, it's a bug in my understanding of the thresholds.
>
> "With the standard freezing policy, the age column will start at one
> billion for a freshly-vacuumed database."
>
> So essentially, 1B is normal, 2B is the max. The logic is now..
>
> The script detects a wrap at 2 billion. It starts warning once one or
> more databases show an age over 1.5 billion transactions. It reports
> critical at 1.75B transactions.
>
> If anyone else understands differently, hit me with a clue bat.
Isn't this obsolete now anyway? I am pretty sure 8.1 has safeguards against
wrap around.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
