On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:47:15PM -0400, Chris Mckenzie wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> My first check was of course a grep/search of the postgres.conf, next it was
> a complete source grep for vacuum_cost_delay.
It's there in head...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:52]~/pgsql/HEAD/src:4%grep -ri vacuum_cost_delay *|wc -l
8
> I've come to the conclusion I need to simply start tracking all transactions
> and determining a cost/performance for the larger and frequently updated
> tables without the benefit and penalty of pg_statio.
Huh? pg_statio shouldn't present a large penalty AFAIK...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
