Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Douglas McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never heard of a 15kRPM SATA drive. > > Well, dollar for dollar you would get the best performance from slower drives > anyways since it would give you more spindles. 15kRPM drives are *expensive*. Depends on your power, heat and rack space budget too... If you need max performance out of a given rack space (rather than max density), SCSI is still the way to go. I'll definitely agree that SATA is becoming much more of a player in the server storage market, though. -Doug ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
