Arnau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the explain analyze shouts the following:
The expensive part appears to be this indexscan:
> -> Index Scan using pk_agndusrgrp_usergroup on
> agenda_users_groups ug (cost=0.00..123740.26 rows=2936058 width=30)
> (actual time=0.101..61921.260 rows=2836638 loops=1)
Since there's no index condition, the planner is evidently using this
scan just to obtain sort order. I think ordinarily it would use a
seqscan and then sort the final result, which'd be a lot faster if the
whole result were being selected. But you have a LIMIT and it's
mistakenly guessing that only a small part of the table will need to be
scanned before the LIMIT is satisfied.
Bottom line: try dropping the LIMIT. If you really need the limit to be
enforced on the SQL side, you could try declaring the query as a cursor
and only fetching 150 rows from it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
