Steve, At the end of the day it seems that you've got a support issue with the SmartArray RAID adapter from HP.
Last I tried that I found that they don't write the cciss driver, don't test it for performance on Linux and don't make any claims about it's performance on Linux. That said - can you contact them through HP tech support and report back to this list what you find out? - Luke > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Poe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:33 PM > To: Luke Lonergan > Cc: Alex Turner; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and > > Luke, > > I check dmesg one more time and I found this regarding the > cciss driver: > > Filesystem "cciss/c1d0p1": Disabling barriers, not supported > by the underlying device. > > Don't know if it means anything, but thought I'd mention it. > > Steve > > > On 8/8/06, Steve Poe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Luke, > > I thought so. In my test, I tried to be fair/equal > since my Sun box has two 4-disc arrays each on their own > channel. So, I just used one of them which should be a little > slower than the 6-disc with 192MB cache. > > Incidently, the two internal SCSI drives, which are on > the 6i adapter, generated a TPS of 18. > > I thought this server would impressive from notes I've > read in the group. This is why I thought I might be doing > something wrong. I stumped which way to take this. There is > no obvious fault but something isn't right. > > > Steve > > > > On 8/8/06, Luke Lonergan < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Steve, > > > Sun box with 4-disc array (4GB RAM. 4 167GB > 10K SCSI RAID10 > > LSI MegaRAID 128MB). This is after 8 runs. > > > > > dbserver-dual-opteron-centos,08/08/06,Tuesday,20,us,12,2,5 > > > dbserver-dual-opteron-centos,08/08/06,Tuesday,20,sy,59,50,53 > > > dbserver-dual-opteron-centos,08/08/06,Tuesday,20,wa,1,0,0 > > > dbserver-dual-opteron-centos,08/08/06,Tuesday,20,id,45,26,38 > > > > Average TPS is 75 > > > > HP box with 8GB RAM. six disc array RAID10 on > SmartArray 642 > > with 192MB RAM. After 8 runs, I see: > > > > intown-vetstar-amd64,08/09/06,Tuesday,23,us,31,0,3 > > intown-vetstar-amd64,08/09/06,Tuesday,23,sy,16,0,1 > > intown-vetstar-amd64,08/09/06,Tuesday,23,wa,99,6,50 > > intown-vetstar-amd64,08/09/06,Tuesday,23,id,78,0,42 > > > > Average TPS is 31. > > Note that the I/O wait (wa) on the HP box high, > low and average are all > *much* higher than on the Sun box. The average > I/O wait was 50% of one > CPU, which is huge. By comparison there was > virtually no I/O wait on > the Sun machine. > > This is indicating that your HP machine is > indeed I/O bound and > furthermore is tying up a PG process waiting > for the disk to return. > > - Luke > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
