On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:05:46PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Wow, interesting. IIRC, XFS is lower performing than ext3,

For xlog, maybe. For data, no. Both are definately slower than ext2 for xlog, which is another reason to have xlog on a small filesystem which doesn't need metadata journalling.

Mike Stone

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to