Cedric Boudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So the question is: is there a correlation between not getting the wal's > archived and this "massive" load growth?
Shouldn't be. Do you want to force the condition again and try to see *where* the cycles are going? "High load factor" alone is a singularly useless report. Also, how many unarchived WAL files were there? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq