"henk de wit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Naively I would say that a planner
> would have to be smart enough to see this by itself?
We got rid of direct tests for redundant WHERE clauses a long time ago
(in 7.4, according to some quick tests I just made). They took a lot
of cycles and almost never accomplished anything.
Since you have two redundant tests, the selectivity is being
double-counted, leading to a too-small rows estimate and a not very
appropriate choice of join plan.
FWIW, CVS HEAD does get rid of the duplicate conditions for the common
case of mergejoinable equality operators --- but it's not explicitly
looking for duplicate conditions, rather this is falling out of a new
method for making transitive equality deductions.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
