On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:35 AM, Roberts, Jon wrote:
Since the SQL is not your fault and difficult to control, it is an
argument in favour of an optional planner mode that would perform
additional checks for redundant clauses of various kinds. The
default
for that would be "off" since most people don't suffer from this
problem. BO isn't the only SQL generating-client out there, so I
think
this is a fairly wide problem.
I would have to disagree. I spend a lot of time writing code that
generates SQL from a business app and feel strongly that any
optimisation is my responsibility.
The point to a BI tool like BO is to abstract the data collection
and do
it dynamically. The SQL is built at run time because the tool is
designed to give the end user as much flexibility as the data
structure
allows to query the data however they want.
It isn't feasible, possible, or recommended to rewrite all of the
possible generated SQL that could be designed at runtime by the tool.
No, but it is feasible to expect the tool to generate well-formed
queries without redundant clauses. There are plenty that do.
Erik Jones
DBA | Emma®
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)
Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
