On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SMART doesn't detect 100% of drive failures in advance, but you'd be silly > to setup a database system where you don't get to take advantage of the > ~50% it does catch before you lose any data.
Can't argue with that one. -- Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
