Hi,
Yes that looks strange. But it is not possible that I have processors in "users_processors" which do not appear in "processors", because "users_processors" contains foreign keys to "processors".

If I remove the LIMIT 10 OFFSET 1 the line "Sort (cost=.... rows=11.." disappears and the query return 13 correct processors from "processors". Then, I have tested different values for OFFSET. If I set Offset to "2" and LIMIT=10 the line is: Sort (cost=113.73..113.75 rows=8 width=5) (actual time=0.322..0.330 rows=12 loops=1)
If I set Offset to "3" and LIMIT=10 it is
Sort (cost=113.73..113.75 rows=8 width=5) (actual time=0.321..0.328 rows=13 loops=1)

It looks like if this "row" is something like min(max_rows=13, LIMIT+OFFSET). But I do not completely understand the Syntax... ;-)

Kind regards
Ulrich

Gregory Stark wrote:
"Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT speed FROM processors WHERE id IN (SELECT processorid
FROM users_processors WHERE userid=4040) ORDER BY speed ASC LIMIT 10 OFFSET 1;

Limit  (cost=113.73..113.75 rows=7 width=5) (actual time=0.335..0.340 rows=10 
loops=1)
  ->  Sort  (cost=113.73..113.75 rows=8 width=5) (actual time=0.332..0.333 
rows=11 loops=1)

                                                                                
  ^^

        Sort Key: processors.speed
        Sort Method:  quicksort  Memory: 17kB
        ->  Nested Loop  (cost=47.22..113.61 rows=8 width=5) (actual 
time=0.171..0.271 rows=13 loops=1)
              ->  HashAggregate  (cost=47.22..47.30 rows=8 width=4) (actual 
time=0.148..0.154 rows=13 loops=1)
                    ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on users_processors  (cost=4.36..47.19 
rows=12 width=4) (actual time=0.074..0.117 rows=13 loops=1)

                                                                                
                                                  ^^

                                Index Cond: (userid = 4040)
              ->  Index Scan using processors_pkey on processors 
(cost=0.00..8.28 rows=1 width=9) (actual time=0.006..0.007 rows=1 loops=13)
                    Index Cond: (processors.id = users_processors.processorid)


It looks to me like you have some processors which appear in
"users_processors" but not in "processors". I don't know your data model but
that sounds like broken referential integrity  to me.



--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to