Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, my guess is that by running under Xen you're already sacrificing > quite a bit of performance, and running it with only 48 Megs of ram is > making it even worse. But if your budget is $100 a year, I guess > you're probably stuck with such a setup. I would see if you can get a > trial Xen at the other hosts with 128M or more of memory and compare.
Is running in a 48 MB Xen any different in terms of performance to running on a hardware 48 MB RAM machine? I see that I am not the only one with such requirements, one guy even set up a site listing all VPS providers which host for under 7$ per month: http://www.lowendbox.com/virtual-server-comparison/ You can see that the most you can get for that money is a 128 MB OpenVZ I wonder if running PostgreSQL on OpenVZ is any different to running it on Xen in terms of performance. Oh here is something more: http://vpsempire.com/action.php?do=vpslite 256 MB for 7.45$ per month 512 MB for 11.95$ per month however it doesn't say what is the virtualization software, so don't really know what it is. -- Miernik http://miernik.name/ -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
