<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If you are completely over-writing an entire stripe, there's no reason to >> read the existing data; you would just calculate the parity information from >> the new data. Any good controller should take that approach. > > in theory yes, in practice the OS writes usually aren't that large and > aligned, > and as a result most raid controllers (and software) don't have the > special-case code to deal with it.
I'm pretty sure all half-decent controllers and software do actually. This is one major reason that large (hopefully battery backed) caches help RAID-5 disproportionately. The larger the cache the more likely it'll be able to wait until the entire raid stripe is replaced avoid having to read in the old parity. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support! -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
