> > > > On the performance impact of using COPY instead of INSERT : out of >> curiosity, were you comparing COPY against raw row-by-row inserts (slow) or >> JDBC batch inserts (faster) or multi-row inserts: INSERT into X (a,b,c) >> values (1,2,3) , (4,5,6) , (7,8,9 ) , (10,11,12) .... ? >> > > I tested row by row and jdbc batch, but I dont have the measured numbers > any more. But I suppose I could recreate the test if, need be. > > regards > thomas > > > Don't re-create it, I was just curious.
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during insert/cop... Thomas Finneid
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during insert/copy Craig Ringer
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during insert/cop... Scott Carey
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during insert... Thomas Finneid
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during insert/cop... Thomas Finneid
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during insert... Scott Marlowe
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during in... Scott Carey
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index durin... Gregory Stark
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index ... Scott Carey
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index durin... Thomas Finneid
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index ... Scott Carey
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index ... Scott Marlowe
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of in... Scott Marlowe
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index durin... Matthew Wakeling
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during insert... Greg Smith
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index during in... Thomas Finneid
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index durin... Greg Smith
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of index ... Thomas Finneid
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of in... Greg Smith
- Re: [PERFORM] slow update of in... Thomas Finneid