I am working with the rsyslog developers to improve it's performance in inserting log messages to databases.

currently they have a postgres interface that works like all the other ones, where rsyslog formats an insert statement, passes that the the interface module, that sends it to postgres (yes, each log as a seperate transaction)

the big win is going to be in changing the core of rsyslog so that it can process multiple messages at a time (bundling them into a single transaction)

but then we run into confusion.

off the top of my head I know of several different ways to get the data into postgres

1. begin; insert; insert;...;end

2. insert into table values (),(),(),()

3. copy from stdin
(how do you tell it how many records to read from stdin, or that you have given it everything without disconnecting)

4. copy from stdin in binary mode

and each of the options above can be done with prepared statements, stored procedures, or functions.

I know that using procedures or functions can let you do fancy things like inserting the row(s) into the appropriate section of a partitioned table

other than this sort of capability, what sort of differences should be expected between the various approaches (including prepared statements vs unprepared)

since the changes that rsyslog is making will affect all the other database interfaces as well, any comments about big wins or things to avoid for other databases would be appriciated.

David Lang

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to