Alvaro Herrera escribió: > Tom Lane escribió: > > > Well, that code isn't even correct I think; you're not supposed to > > modify a GUC variable directly. I think you should just silently > > use a naptime of at least X without changing the nominal GUC variable. > > And definitely without the WARNING --- that's nothing but log spam. > > Glitches fixed in this version; will apply shortly to 8.3 and HEAD.
Committed. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
