Scott Marlowe wrote:
Also think about it, the OP has 8G of swap and 30Gig cached. How / why would you be caching 30Gigs worth of data when there's only 8G to cache anyway?
You're right, I have misread it again :-) Cheers, Mike -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
